Disclaimer: The ideas and opinions expressed in these
documents are those of the authors. Inclusion on this list does not necessarily
constitute endorsement by the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society.
The articles listed below have been reproduced with the
permission of the publisher. The downloadable files are in PDF format.
|
Title:
|
DDC
Chamber View-port Catastrophic Failure
|
|
Author(s):
|
Association of Diving Contractors International
|
|
Appeared in:
|
|
|
Publisher:
|
ADCI
|
|
Description:
|
This view-port was in a deck chamber where someone had
placed droplight too close to the port.. The resulting radiant heat from the lamp
exceeded the design temperature of the view-port.
|
|
Title:
|
Decompression
Sickness in Inside Attendants
|
|
Author(s):
|
PJ Sheffield, C Pirone
|
|
Appeared in:
|
Hyperbaric Facility Safety: A Practical Guide (1999)
|
|
Publisher:
|
Best Publishing Company, Flagstaff, AZ
|
|
Description:
|
This chapter discusses the risk of decompression sickness
in hyperbaric chamber inside attendants. A review of the literature reveals
that attendant oxygen breathing, more conservative decompression profiles,
and attention to variables that affect attendant fitness were effective
actions taken to reduce decompression sickness incidence.
|
|
Title:
|
Hyperbaric
and Hypobaric Chamber Fires: A 73-year Analysis
|
|
Author(s):
|
PJ Sheffield, DA Desautels
|
|
Appeared in:
|
Undersea Hyper Med, 1997; 24(3): 153-164
|
|
Publisher:
|
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Dunkirk, MD
|
|
Abstract:
|
Fire can be catastrophic in the confined space of a
hyperbaric chamber. From 1923 to 1996, 77 human fatalities occurred in 35 hyperbaric
chamber fires, three human fatalities in a pressurized Apollo Command Module,
and two human fatalities in three hypobaric chamber fires reported in Asia,
Europe, and North America. Two fires occurred in diving bells, eight occurred
in recompression (or decompression) chambers, and 25 occurred in clinical
hyperbaric chambers. No fire fatalities were reported in the clinical
hyperbaric chambers of North America. Chamber fires before 1980 were
principally caused by electrical ignition. Since 1980, chamber fires have
been primarily caused by prohibited sources of ignition that an occupant
carried inside the chamber. Each fatal chamber fire has occurred in an
enriched oxygen atmosphere (>28% oxygen) and in the presence of abundant
burnable material. Chambers pressurized with air (<23.5% oxygen) had the
only survivors. Information in this report was obtained from the literature
and from the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society's Chamber Experience and
Mishap Database. This epidemiologic review focuses on information learned
from critical analyses of chamber fires and how it can be applied to safe
operation of hypobaric and hyperbaric chambers.
|
|
Title:
|
UHMS
Chamber Experience and Mishap Database Report (1923 - 1998)
|
|
Author(s):
|
DA Desautels
|
|
Appeared in:
|
Undersea Hyper Med, 1997; 24(3): 153-164
|
|
Publisher:
|
|
|
Description:
|
This article summarizes hyperbaric mishap data collected
by the UHMS Hyperbaric Oxygen Safety Committee up to 1998. This database is
no longer active.
|
|
Title:
|
Titanium in a Hyperbaric Oxygen Environment May Pose a
Fire Risk
|
|
Author(s):
|
J Hink, E Jansen
|
|
Appeared in:
|
Aviat Space Environ Med 2003; 74(12): 1301-1302
|
|
Publisher:
|
Aerospace Medical Association, Alexandria, VA
|
|
Description:
|
The use of titanium during hyperbaric oxygen therapy may
pose a risk of fire. A fresh titanium surface in a high oxygen atmosphere can
be a source of ignition. The clinical scenario may be a patient who
accidentally breaks his titanium-framed glasses during a hyperbaric oxygen
treatment in a monoplace chamber or using an oxygen hood. We recommend some
safety precautions to be exercised until consensus standards have been
established by the hyperbaric medicine community.
|
|
Title:
|
Air-Activated
Chemical Warming Devices: Effects of Oxygen and Pressure
|
|
Author(s):
|
G Raleigh, R Rivard, S Fabus
|
|
Appeared in:
|
Undersea Hyper Med 2005; 32(6)
|
|
Publisher:
|
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society
|
|
Description:
|
Air-activated chemical warming devices use an exothermic
chemical reaction of rapidly oxidizing iron to generate heat for therapeutic
purposes. Placing these products in a hyperbaric oxygen environment greatly
increases the supply of oxidant and thus increases the rate of reaction and
maximum temperature. Testing for auto-ignition and maximum temperatures
attained by ThermaCare™ Heat Wraps, Playtex™ Heat Therapy, and Heat Factory®
disposable warm packs under ambient conditions and under conditions similar
to those encountered during hyperbaric oxygen treatments in monoplace and
multiplace hyperbaric chambers (3 atm abs and >95% oxygen) revealed a
maximum temperature of 269°F (132°C) with no spontaneous ignition. The risk
of thermal burn injury to adjacent skin may be significantly increased if
these devices are used under conditions of hyperbaric oxygen.
|
|
Title:
|
OXYGEN CONNECTION SAFETY SYSTEMS
|
|
Author(s):
|
Bill
Gearhart, CHT, DMT, EMT, CFPS
|
|
Appeared in:
|
UHMS Pressure Membership Newsletter
|
|
Publisher:
|
|
|
Description:
|
I wrote an article explaining the storage details of small,
"E” sized oxygen cylinders in the Health Care Environment. I received one question regarding the
article and it asked if there could be more cylinders if the area was larger.
The determining factor in this situation is the smoke compartment size
requirement in a Health Care Occupancy, which is limited to 22,500 square
feet, (2,100 meters square) and the travel distance to an exit can be no
longer than 200 linear feet. These requirements are stated in NFPA 101,
18.3.7 & 19.3.7, (Subdivision of Building Spaces), New and Existing
Health Care Occupancies, respectively.
|
|